Survey Results Preview:
How Have the
University System of Maryland Covid-19 Mandates
Impacted You?
Since USM Chancellor Perman’s announcement of the system-wide USM Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate on April 23, 2021, the Institution has focused on reducing transmission. In the year since implementation, there has been no known assessment of the effects of the USM Covid-19 mandated policies on their employees, students, and other affiliates.
Here are the results of a survey conducted to capture and assess collateral impacts of the mandates. The survey was administered for informational purposes only and is not intended to be scientific. There are notable results showing a majority of respondents (80%) indicate physical and psychological harm resulting from the mandates. A majority of respondents (80%) also reported they do not believe USM should have the authority to make risk/benefit decisions regarding medical procedures. The majority of respondents also state that Covid-19 no longer remains a serious health threat on campus and that the Covid-19 mandate/policies are not necessary for safety. There are also important considerations for student retention as a notable number of respondents shared that they considered leaving USM / transferring to a school without similar Covid-19 restrictions. |
The USM Covid-19 Mandate Impact Report is being shared with the USM community and to the general public. The results provide insight into collateral impacts and clearly necessitate further attention from USM and individual institutional COVID-19 response leadership to make necessary changes to eliminate adverse physical, psychological, financial and academic impacts of the Mandates.
There have also been formal requests sent to the USM Chancellor's office to have USM Covid-19 Vaccine mandates and related policies added as an agenda item at the earliest upcoming Board of Regents meeting. These requests have yet to be accepted. Covid-19 mandates and mandated policies impact many vital aspects of USM. It has been a year since mandates were announced. It is time for broad student, staff, faculty inclusion and public comment. Join in the efforts to bring awareness to USM Chancellor Perman and the USM Regents. Write today to request that USM Covid-19 Vaccine mandates and related policies added as an agenda item at the earliest upcoming Board of Regents meeting by sending an email to [email protected] . |
The USM Mandate Impact Report
* Survey is not affiliated with or sponsored by USM. For informational purposes only.
Executive Summary and Survey Result Preview Files for Download:
Read the Survey Report here:
Students, faculty/staff, parents, and alumni in the University System of Maryland (USM) have spoken! It’s time for USM leadership to listen to those impacted by Covid-19 Mandates. In an effort to minimize future harm to the USM community, careful evaluation and consideration of the full impact of Covid-19 mandates predicate implementation of effective and successful policy practices. Since the Chancellor’s announcement of the system-wide Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate on April 23, 2021, USM has focused on reducing transmission. In the year since implementation, there has been no known assessment of the effects of the USM Covid-19 mandated policies on their constituencies. We present findings from a survey designed to capture the collateral impacts of the mandates. We were curious about possible physical, psychological, academic, and/or financial impacts of USM Covid-19 mandates and associated policies. In this document, we first describe survey methods and demographics of respondents. Then, we address three key areas pertaining to Covid-19 mandated policies:
Methods The survey was unsponsored and unfunded. Conducted over a short four-week time period between January 16, 2022 and February 19, 2022, the results represent a convenience sample of 307 individuals. The survey consists of 17 questions about impacts from USM Covid-19 Mandates, with six open response options. The survey was distributed to USM students and their families, as well as USM alumni, employees, staff, and faculty at UMD College Park, Towson University, Salisbury University, Bowie State University, University of Baltimore, UMBC, and Frostburg University via email, social media platforms, and word of mouth. Though not intended to be a scientific study, the survey is representative of thoughts, opinions, and experiences among a diverse range of USM stakeholders with educational and financial interests. Thus, while the data findings are not necessarily generalizable, our findings necessitate further attention from USM and individual institutional COVID-19 response leadership. Respondent Demographics Of the 307 survey respondents, 187 were current USM students or employees, 96 were a parent of a student(s), 28 were alumni, and 14 were not directly affiliated with USM. (Note: 28 respondents qualified for more than one demographic. For example, a parent may also be an alumni or a student may also be an employee.) Important Demographics about our 187 student/faculty/staff survey respondents:
Covid History of Respondents confirmed by PCR or Antibody test:
Vaccination Status of Student/Faculty/Staff Respondents:
Student/Faculty/Staff Reasons for Getting Vaccinated:
Opinions about USM Covid-19 Mandated Policies USM Covid-19 mandates and policies include:
Categories (in order) for the 'Percent of Respondents Agreeing /Disagreeing with specific USM Covid-19 Policies': Masking with KN95s in classroom, Original 2 Vaxx requirement, Booster for Spring 2022, Quarantine for Covid Positive, Quarantine for Covid exposed, Twice weekly testing for exempted, Noncomplaince consequences, All of the above, None of the above. Respondents had the option to write in ‘Other’ USM Covid-19 policies for which they agreed/ disagreed; these include:
|
Opinions about USM Covid-19 Mandated Policies (continued)
Unintended Impacts of USM Covid19 Policies on Health
Percent of respondents who reported current USM Covid-19 mandates/policies negatively impacted their mental and physical health (n=187):
Respondents opted to provide 142 comments regarding the impact of USM Covid-19 policies on mental and physical health. An analysis of the comments indicated frequent mentions of several keywords/phrases; these keywords and the number of times they were mentioned in the comments are stated below:
respondent’s mental or physical health has been negatively impacted Number of respondents considering leaving/transferring to a school with less restrictive Covid-19 policies or already transferred or took time off from USM. Parents of students had the option to respond to this question as well (n=307):
Punitive Consequences of USM Covid-19 Mandates and Mandated Policies, including Covid-19 Vaccination, Covid-19 Booster, Testing, and Masking Students/faculty/staff who have COVID-19 vaccine exemptions or individuals who are not up to date are required to test twice weekly for Covid on several USM campuses. At other campuses, testing is required once weekly for these individuals. At times, some have been out of compliance with this policy for a variety of reasons, including illness, car troubles, scheduling conflicts, and family emergencies. System ‘glitches’ have also caused individuals to be incorrectly flagged as out of compliance.. Out of 68 students/faculty/staff with exemptions who responded, 51% reported receiving at least one punitive consequence for being out of compliance. Respondents were able to choose more than one response if applicable. The most common responses included:
Additional consequences (reported below) occurred less often or in individual cases. These consequences may have been given for other reasons than being out of testing compliance, such as for being unvaccinated or not up to date with vaccinations:
Students/faculty/staff were asked to share punitive consequences they received for not wearing a mask, or not wearing a mask properly (e.g. below the nose). The most common consequences reported were:
|
The USM Mandate Impact Report: Addendum
Examples of the 142 respondent comments regarding negative impacts on mental and/or physical health - paraphrased
Employment:
General:
Academic Harm, Physical/Psychological Harm, Denied Access to Food & Housing, etc.
|
Academic Harm, Physical/Psychological Harm, Denied Access to Food & Housing, etc. (examples continued):
|
Academic Harm, Physical/Psychological Harm, Denied Access to Food & Housing, etc. (examples continued):
|